Jump to content

Talk:Three Colours: Red

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This page needs to indicate that this film is based on the concept of 'fraternity', as Three Colours: Blue is based on liberty and Three Colours: White is based on equality. - Zoe Ocean 00:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Threecolorsred.jpg

[edit]

Image:Threecolorsred.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 08:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Analysis" section has no academic references, and the single reference is to a reviewer stating only one of the numerous claims.

[edit]

I am a film scholar and this is not appropriate for any type of encyclopaedia. The analysis given is not common among film theorists and critics, and it would be simple for someone to find basic sources for a variety of interpretations of this film. ~ ~ ~ ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.223.253 (talk) 10:31, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]